Thermally Driven Carbon-Membrane Desalination beyond Nominal Performance: Mechanisms, Uncertainty, and Deployment

Authors

  • Graham Benson Author
  • Heath Norton Author
  • Ivan Walsh Author

Keywords:

Thermally Driven Carbon-Membrane Desalination, Thermal Driving, Surface Wettability, Pore Architecture, Selectivity, Membrane Fabrication

Abstract

Research spanning thermally driven carbon-membrane desalination increasingly joins methods that were developed for different objects and decisions. Here, a monolayer array of carbon nanotubes as nanoscale transport pores is compared with coupling a temperature gradient with graphene-channel surface wettability to determine which claims can travel across those boundaries and which remain context dependent. Two target papers are triangulated against 12 locally validated publications. The comparison follows thermal driving, surface wettability, pore architecture, selectivity, membrane fabrication and deliberately separates mechanistic interpretation from performance ranking, because the latter can conceal incompatible experimental or operational conditions. The synthesis shows that thermal driving cannot be interpreted independently of surface wettability, while pore architecture determines whether an apparent improvement remains meaningful outside the original setting. The strongest claims are therefore those that expose sensitivity, failure conditions, and residual uncertainty. The contribution is a decision-oriented synthesis that connects method selection to failure cost and treats reproducibility, provenance, and bounded generalization as first-order design requirements.

Archive transfer

Originally published in Inclusive Growth and Management Quarterly (NB), article 109, on 2026-08-31. Transferred to Advances in Science and Knowledge on 3 November 2026. The original authors, publication date and article text are retained.

References

  1. Wang, T., Jiang, H., Shao, X., Pei, J., Zheng, H., & Hu, X. (2021). Carbon nanotube arrays as monolayer nanoscale membrane for enhanced desalination. Desalination and Water Treatment, 234, 333-347.
  2. Wang, T., Pei, J., & Jiang, H. (2024). Desalination Driven by Temperature Gradient Coupled with Surface Wettability in a Graphene Channel. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 63(49), 21565-21571.
  3. Fan, X., Liu, Y., & Quan, X. (2019). A novel reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hollow fiber membrane with high forward osmosis performance. Desalination, 451, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.020
  4. Kim, Y. M., Ebro, H., & Kim, J. H. (2016). Molecular dynamics simulation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination using carbon nanotube membranes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(43), 20169-20176. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1112982
  5. Altaee, A., Zaragoza, G., & van Tonningen, H. R. (2014). Comparison between Forward Osmosis-Reverse Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis processes for seawater desalination. Desalination, 336, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.002
  6. Wan Azelee, I., Goh, P. S., Lau, W. J., & Ismail, A. F. (2018). Facile acid treatment of multiwalled carbon nanotube-titania nanotube thin film nanocomposite membrane for reverse osmosis desalination. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.212
  7. Shi, Q., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., Meng, Z., Rao, D., Su, J., et al. (2018). Bilayer graphene with ripples for reverse osmosis desalination. Carbon, 136, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.053
  8. Jasim, H. K., Al-Ridah, Z. A., & Naje, A. S. (2024). Graphene oxide–carbon nanotube composite membrane for enhanced removal of organic pollutants by forward osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 318, 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100363
  9. Vatanpour, V., & Sanadgol, A. (2020). Surface modification of reverse osmosis membranes by grafting of polyamidoamine dendrimer containing graphene oxide nanosheets for desalination improvement. Desalination, 491, 114442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114442
  10. Kashif, M., Sabri, M. A., Zhang, N., & Banat, F. (2024). Graphene: A diamond hammer for cracking hard nuts in reverse osmosis desalination membranes. Desalination, 581, 117552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2024.117552
  11. Cohen-Tanugi, D., & Grossman, J. C. (2015). Nanoporous graphene as a reverse osmosis membrane: Recent insights from theory and simulation. Desalination, 366, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.046
  12. Park, J., Choi, W., Kim, S. H., Chun, B. H., Bang, J., & Lee, K. B. (2010). Enhancement of Chlorine Resistance in Carbon Nanotube Based Nanocomposite Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 15(1-3), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1686
  13. Binger, Z. M., & Achilli, A. (2020). Forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis process modeling for integration with seawater reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination, 491, 114583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114583
  14. Mahdavi, H., & Rahimi, A. (2018). Zwitterion functionalized graphene oxide/polyamide thin film nanocomposite membrane: Towards improved anti-fouling performance for reverse osmosis. Desalination, 433, 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.031

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31